VALLEY FORGE RENAISSANCE, L.P. v. GREYSTONE SERVICING CORPORATION, INC.
| VALLEY FORGE RENAISSANCE, L.P. |
| GREYSTONE SERVICING CORPORATION, INC. |
| 1:2009cv00131 |
| February 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Marion |
| David Frank Hamilton |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
141
ENTRY ON MOTION TO RECONSIDER - Valley Forge's Motion to Reconsider or in the Alternative Certify for Interlocutory Appeal (Dkt. # 136 ) is DENIED in its entirety. The trial in this matter remains set to begin on July 23, 2012. **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/14/2012. (JD)
|
|
Filing
129
AMENDED ENTRY ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Greystone's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 98 ) is GRANTED with respect to Valley Forge's claims for theft, conversion, and violating the Indiana Securities Act, and DENIED wi th respect to Valley Forge's breach of contract claim and its own breach of contract counterclaim. Valley Forge's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 99 ) is DENIED with respect to all claims. Simply stated, the Court finds that the parties' competing breach of contract claims are the only claims suitable for trial. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/18/2012.(JD)
|
|
Filing
128
ENTRY ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Greystone's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 98 ) is GRANTED with respect to Valley Forge's claims for theft, conversion, and violating the Indiana Securities Act, and DENIED with respect to Valley Forge's breach of contract claim and its own breach of contract counterclaim. Valley Forge's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 99 ) is DENIED with respect to all claims. Simply stated, the Court finds that the parties' competing breach of contract claims are the only claims suitable for trial. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/17/2012. (JD)
|
|
Filing
103
ENTRY re 81 DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER - Greystone's objections should be overruled because the Magistrate Judge's decision was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. And, as a practical matter, the Court finds that this issue is best settled through the summary judgment briefing, which has already begun in this case. A contrary decision needlessly risks "jumping the gun." Given the deferential standard of review and the fact that this issue is already being hashed out in dispositive motion briefing [Dkt. 100 and 102 ], the Court OVERRULES Greystone's objections to the Magistrate Judge's order [Dkt. 81 ]. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/30/2011. (JD)
|
|
Filing
50
ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS: For the foregoing reasons, the Defendants Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 20 is GRANTED as to Count IV; however, the Motion is DENIED as to Counts I, II, and III **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/6/2010. (DWH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: VALLEY FORGE RENAISSANCE, L.P. v. GREYSTONE SERVICING CORPORATION, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: VALLEY FORGE RENAISSANCE, L.P. | |
| Represented By: | Samuel J. Schmutte |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GREYSTONE SERVICING CORPORATION, INC. | |
| Represented By: | James W. Riley, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
