GILDAY v. KENRA, LTD. et al
| KARAN L. GILDAY |
| KENRA, LTD., IMPERIAL CAPITAL GROUP LTD. and JONATHAN D. SHERMAN |
| 1:2009cv00229 |
| February 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Marion |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Age) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
160
***PLEASE SEE CORRECTED DOCUMENT 162 ***ENTRY on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment - Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. 78 ] is GRANTED and a separate judgment shall enter in favor of Defendants. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike [Dkt. 90 ] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The pending motion [Dkt. 157 ] is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/4/2011. (TRG) Modified on 3/4/2011 (TRG).
|
|
Filing
146
ORDER granting in part and denying in part defts' 112 Motion for Protective Order; denying pltf's 133 Motion to Strike; granting pltf's 138 Motion for Leave to supplement appendix of designated evidence (see Order for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 10/4/2010. (SWM)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER denying pltf's 62 Motion to enlarge liability and non-expert discovery deadlines; denying defts' 71 Motion for expedited ruling on the dispositive motions deadlines (see Order for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 5/7/2010. (SWM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
