GOLUB v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE et al
MARTIN C. GOLUB |
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ROGER GOODES, DOUGLAS LEHMAN, WALTER "BUDDY&quo BYRNES, JANE DOE, # 1, JANE DOE , # 2, JANE DOE, #3, JANE DOE, #4 and JOHN AND JANE DOES "1" THROUGH "100 |
1:2009cv00380 |
March 27, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Marion |
David Frank Hamilton |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 141 ENTRY - For the reasons set forth the 139 Motion for recusal of The Honorable Tanya Walton Pratt is DENIED. (**SEE ENTRY**). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/30/2010. (JD) |
Filing 129 ENTRY Discussing Motion to Dismiss - The defendants' motion to dismiss (dkt 114 ) is granted. The plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (dkt 127 ) is denied. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/10/2010.(TRG) |
Filing 126 ORDER denying 124 Motion for Reconsideration. (See Entry) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/31/2010. c/m (TMA) |
Filing 123 ENTRY Discussing Motions for Default and Applications for Default and Entry of Default - The plaintiff's motions for default and applications for default and entry of default as identified in this Entry are each denied. Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 2/8/2010. (TRG) |
Filing 49 ENTRY CONCERNING SELECTED MATTERS - granting 37 Plaintiff's motion to file a correction and amendment of motion; denying 40 and 43 Plaintiff's motion to correct error in Plaintiff's pleadings; granting 42 Plaintiff's " ;motion to add an addendum to plaintiff filed motion correct an error in plaintiff's pleadings, motion for relief and reconsideration from the court order, relief from judgment or order and to correct a deficient error in plaintiff's pleadings"; denying 45 and 46 motion for default judgment; and denying 47 Plaintiff's motion for relief and reconsideration. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 8/27/2009. c/m. (LBK) |
Filing 36 ENTRY CONCERNING SELECTED MATTERS. For the reasons discussed in paragraph 1 of this Entry, the claims against the United States Secret Service and Department of Homeland Security are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Claims against several unident ified John and Jane Does are dismissed because it is pointless to include anonymous defendants in federal court (see paragraph 2 of Entry). No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claims resolved in this Entry. The dismissal of John and Jane Doe defendants shall not include dismissal as to the other defendants (Diane Smith, Melanie Mackenzie, Special Agent Johnon and McKenzie). Plaintiff's motion to show cause and order to compel (dkt. 35) seeks developments of claims againt the agency defendants and is therefore denied. Motion to Stay (docket 29) is denied. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 7/16/2009. c/m. (LBK) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.