HECKLER & KOCH, INC. v. PRECISION AIRSOFT, LLC
Plaintiff: HECKLER & KOCH, INC.
Defendant: PRECISION AIRSOFT, LLC
Case Number: 1:2009cv00485
Filed: April 20, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Trademark Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Presiding Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Trademark

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER granting 31 Motion to Transfer. This case is ordered transferred to the Eastern District of Washington. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/25/2010. (LBK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HECKLER & KOCH, INC. v. PRECISION AIRSOFT, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HECKLER & KOCH, INC.
Represented By: Darlene R. Seymour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PRECISION AIRSOFT, LLC
Represented By: Lee B. McTurnan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?