BENNETT v. GATES
Plaintiff: RICKOMO BENNETT
Defendant: ROBERT M. GATES
Case Number: 1:2009cv00647
Filed: May 26, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge: Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge: David Frank Hamilton
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER granting 31 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons noted herein, Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. 31] is GRANTED in its entirety. A separate judgment shall issue in favor of Defendant, Robert Gates, Secretary, Department of Defense. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 11/9/2010. (JD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BENNETT v. GATES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RICKOMO BENNETT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROBERT M. GATES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?