CUMMINS, INC. v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY et al
| CUMMINS, INC. |
| ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLIANZ GLOBAL RISKS US INSURANCE COMPANY, AXIS INSURANCE COMPANY, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO., GENERAL SECURITY INDEMNITY COMPANY OF ARIZONA, HDI-GERLING INDUSTRIES VERSICHERUNG AG, LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., XL INSURANCE AMERICA, INC., GREAT LAKES REINSURANCE UK, PLC (MUNICH RE), LLOYD'S OF LONDON (KLN AND CSL) VIA GEP and STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 1:2009cv00738 |
| June 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Bartholomew |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Richard L. Young |
| Defendant |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
151
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 115 Motion to Compel. (See Order.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 5/2/2011. (LH)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 87 Motion to Compel. Cummins's motion to compel (Dkt. 87) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, on the terms set forth in this entry. The defendants' request for oral argument (Dkt. 93) is DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 1/14/2011. (LH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
