DOE v. THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE INDIANA STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS
| JANE DOE |
| THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE INDIANA STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS |
| 1:2009cv00842 |
| July 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Porter |
| Tim A. Baker |
| William T. Lawrence |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
236
Entry on Pending Motion - 235 Motion Regarding Indiana Supreme Court is denied. See entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/9/2018. (MEJ)
|
|
Filing
233
ENTRY - ON PENDING MOTIONS; This matter is before the Court on several matters: A Motion for Contempt of Court against the Indiana State Board of Law Examiners, Motion for Contempt of Court and Motion for Judgment filed by Interested Pa rty Robert M. Shaw. There has been no order issued in this case which permits Mr. Shaw to obtain any of the relief sought in his post-judgment motions. Accordingly, Mr. Shaw's Motions Filing No. 221 Filing No. 228 and Filing No. 232 are DENIED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/11/2015. Copy Mailed. (CKM)
|
|
Filing
188
ENTRY ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Plaintiffs' Motion (Dkt. 145 ) is GRANTED with respect to Question 23 but DENIED with respect to Questions 22, 24, and 25. Conversely, the Board's Motion (Dkt. 155 ) is GRANTED with respect t o Questions 22, 24, and 25 but DENIED with respect to Question 23. The parties are directed to notify the Court within seven days if entry of Final Judgment is appropriate. If the parties agree that Final Judgment is appropriate, they are directed to submit a mutually agreeable proposed Final Judgment at that time. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/20/2011. (JD)
|
|
Filing
152
ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER - For the reasons set forth, the Court AFFIRMS 124 Magistrate Judge's May 31, 2010 Order, DENYING the Board's 127 Motion to Reconsider. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/23/2010. (JD)
|
|
Filing
119
ENTRY ON STANDING, CLASS REPRESENTATION, AND MOTION TO RECONSIDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that the ACLU has standing and is an appropriate class representative. Accordingly, the ACLU's request to be appointed a class representative is GRANTED. In addition, the Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration 95 is DENIED **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 3/25/2010. (DWH)
|
|
Filing
84
ENTRY ON AMENDED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION: GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART 41 Amended Motion to Certify Class. For the foregoing reasons, the Plaintiffs' Amended Motion for Class Certification 41 is GRANTED as to Plaintiff Perdue. Because the Court is unable to determine whether the ACLU has standing, the Court cannot find that the ACLU is an appropriate class representative. Accordingly, the Amended Motion for Class Certification is DENIED as to the ACLU. Within 21 days of th e date of this Entry the ACLU shall file a brief in support of its standing. The Defendants shall have 14 days to respond, and no reply is necessary. If the Court finds that the ACLU has standing, and if the organization still wishes to be a class representative, then the ACLU may file an appropriate motion at that time **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/29/2010. (DWH)
|
|
Filing
73
ENTRY ON OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE'S ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Doe's Motion to Review and Reverse the Magistrate Judge's Decision 22 is DENIED. Within 14 days of this entry Doe shall file an amended complaint that identifies her by name **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/4/2010.(DWH)
|
|
Filing
60
ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS: For the foregoing reasons, the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 27 is DENIED **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 12/8/2009. (DWH)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER denying pltf's 7 Motion to proceed under an anonymous name and to seal affidavit containing actual name. Pltf shall file an amended complaint w/i 14 days that identifies her by name (see Order for other details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 8/8/09. (SWM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DOE v. THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE INDIANA STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JANE DOE | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth J. Falk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE INDIANA STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
