SHORT et al v. HIGHWAY SAFETY SERVICES, INC.
| MICHAEL J. SHORT and INDIANA LABORERS WELFARE, PENSION AND TRAINING FUNDS |
| HIGHWAY SAFETY SERVICES, INC. |
| 1:2009cv00931 |
| July 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Vigo |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER - ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 45 ; The Court has considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation entered on August 9, 2012 and observes that Defendant has not filed an objection to it within the time permi tted by law. Accordingly, the Court finds that the undisputed evidence presented at the August 7, 2012 hearing before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker establishes that Defendant failed to pay required contributions to Plaintiffs for various period s since 2011, totaling $24,803.26. Accordingly, a supplemental judgment shall issue in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant in the amount of $24,803.26. Plaintiffs are entitled to execute immediately on the supplemental judgment. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/19/2012. Copy Mailed.(CKM)
|
|
Filing
12
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, PERMANENT INJUNCTION against defendant (S.O.) cm. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 5/6/2010.(MAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
