WILLIAMS v. GENE B. GLICK COMPANY, INC. et al
Plaintiff: ANGELA R. WILLIAMS
Defendant: GENE B. GLICK COMPANY, INC., CARRIAGE HOUSE EAST III ASSOCIATES LLP, AVERT SECURITY LLC and INDIANA QUADEL CONSULTING CORP.
Case Number: 1:2009cv01113
Filed: September 9, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
County: Marion
Presiding Judge: William T. Lawrence
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 161 ENTRY ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Defendants Carriage House and Glick's Second Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 143 ) is GRANTED. In addition, Avert's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 136 ) is also GRANTED in its entirety. Final Judgment in favor of the Defendants will accompany this Entry. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/27/2012. Copy Mailed. (JD)
September 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 133 ENTRY - For the reasons explained in this Entry, Butts' 84 Motion for Summary Judgment must be GRANTED and the Plaintiff's Motion to Alert Court to Errors [dkt 130] is DENIED. The ruling in this Entry does not resolve all claims against all parties in this action. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claim resolved in this Entry. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/7/2011. (JD)
June 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 58 Defendants Glick and Carriage House East's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 27 Defendant Quadel's Motion to Dismiss; denying 39 Defendant Avert's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 6/14/2010. (JHO)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WILLIAMS v. GENE B. GLICK COMPANY, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANGELA R. WILLIAMS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GENE B. GLICK COMPANY, INC.
Represented By: Ryan J. Guillory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CARRIAGE HOUSE EAST III ASSOCIATES LLP
Represented By: Ryan J. Guillory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AVERT SECURITY LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INDIANA QUADEL CONSULTING CORP.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?