WHITE v. IPS
Plaintiff: BRENDA LYNN WHITE
Defendant: IPS
Case Number: 1:2009cv01134
Filed: September 11, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
County: Marion
Presiding Judge: Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge: Larry J. McKinney
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER granting 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion for summary judgment filed by IPS (dkt 18) is GRANTED because the undisputed evidentiary record establishes that IPS is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/2/2010. (JD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WHITE v. IPS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRENDA LYNN WHITE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IPS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?