THE CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK OF PARIS v. DVORAK
Plaintiff: THE CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK OF PARIS
Defendant: PETER DVORAK
Case Number: 1:2009cv01147
Filed: September 14, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: O Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Presiding Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: O
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER granting plaintiff's 35 Motion for Summary Judgment (S.O.). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/12/2010. (MAC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: THE CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK OF PARIS v. DVORAK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PETER DVORAK
Represented By: Niccole Rene Sadowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THE CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK OF PARIS
Represented By: Angela Michelle Hopper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?