GANT v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Indiana Southern District GANT v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

GANT v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

Plaintiff:	CORA GANT
Defendant:	UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Case Number:	1:2009cv01193
Filed:	September 25, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
County:	Marion
Presiding Judge:	Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge:	Richard L. Young
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 25, 2011	Filing 40 ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO FILE EXHIBITS UNDER SEAL - This cause is set for a pretrial conference at 1:30 p.m. on February 16, 2011, Room 234, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana. Parties shall participate in t his conference by counsel. The Court will use this conference as an opportunity to informally resolve Carrier's 33 motion to enforce. If that motion cannot be informally resolved at that time, the Court will consider any additional arguments t he parties may wish to make regarding the 35 motion to seal. The Court will maintain the disputed exhibits under seal until that conference. However, the Court has serious reservations about the propriety of maintaining the purported settlement agreement and related documents under seal given that the Court is now being asked to enforce this purported agreement. (SEE ORDER) Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 1/25/2011.(JD)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 25, 2011

Filing 40 ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO FILE EXHIBITS UNDER SEAL - This cause is set for a pretrial conference at 1:30 p.m. on February 16, 2011, Room 234, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana. Parties shall participate in t his conference by counsel. The Court will use this conference as an opportunity to informally resolve Carrier's 33 motion to enforce. If that motion cannot be informally resolved at that time, the Court will consider any additional arguments t he parties may wish to make regarding the 35 motion to seal. The Court will maintain the disputed exhibits under seal until that conference. However, the Court has serious reservations about the propriety of maintaining the purported settlement agreement and related documents under seal given that the Court is now being asked to enforce this purported agreement. (**SEE ORDER**) Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 1/25/2011.(JD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GANT v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: CORA GANT
Represented By:	Gregory A. Stowers
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?