GREEN MOUNTAIN FINANCIAL FUND LLC v. LACROIX et al
| GREEN MOUNTAIN FINANCIAL FUND LLC |
| LORI RAPPAPORT LACROIX and MARGUERITE DOWNS RAPPAPORT |
| LORI RAPPAPORT LACROIX, SYLVIA RAPPAPORT, COURTNEY LACROIX and HUNTER LACROIX |
| MARGUERITE DOWNS RAPPAPORT, GREEN MOUNTAIN FINANCIAL FUND LLC, SOUTHWEST GUARANTY, LTD., THE TOWN OF CLARKSVILLE, IN, RICHARD DICKMAN, GREGORY ISRIGG, PAUL KRAFT, DONALD TETLEY, BOB POPP, RAYMOND RICHERT, DAVID FISHER, VICKI APPLEBY, RICHARD JONES, STEVEN FLEECE, DANIEL DONOHUE, JEROME JACOBI, VICKY CARMICHAEL, JOHN B. RIORDAN, ANDREW MARTIN, ESQ, DAVID E. FRENCH, JOHN GEORGE, BARRY BOHANNON, LOIS GARRETT, JOSEPH COHEN, ESQ., THE JEFFERSONVILLE TRIBUNE NEWS, THE COURIER JOURNAL NEWS, MORGAN STANLEY DW INC., RICHARD JAY BERGER and MEGAN MARIE MCGRATH |
| 1:2009cv01216 |
| September 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Tim A. Baker |
| David Frank Hamilton |
| Defendant |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
553
Entry and Order Dismissing Action - At the time the joint motion for partial final judgment was filed, there were unresolved claims asserted in the third-party complaint. Based on the discussion in Part I.B. of this Entry, however, that is no longe r the case. All claims against all parties have been resolved. The only relief awarded in this action is that to which Green Mountain is entitled based on its motion for summary judgment being granted. All relief sought by any other party, in any other form, is denied. The entry of final judgment is therefore appropriate, but it need not be a partial final judgment. The joint motion for entry of partial final judgment [dkt 549 ] is therefore denied as moot. Judgment consistent with this Entry and with pertinent prior rulings shall now issue. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 11/18/2013. Copies Mailed. (JD)
|
|
Filing
314
ORDER denying 261 Motion; denying 286 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Based on the foregoing, and based on her failure to show that there is any valid basis on which to conclude that public funds could be expended on her behalf, Lo ri Rappaport LaCroixs requests to proceed as indigent [261 and 286] are DENIED. Her request to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed on October 27, 2011, will be addressed in a separate ruling. *** SEE ENTRY ***. cm. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 11/7/2011. (CKM)
|
|
Filing
301
ORDER denying 294 Motion to Vacate. Lori and defendants Bohannon and George shall have through November 4, 2011, in which to further discuss their position on the motion to disqualify. Each of the third party defendants shall have through November 14, 2011, in which to summarize briefly the claims against them in the third party complaint and their defenses to those claims. *** SEE ENTRY *** cm. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/25/2011. (CKM)
|
|
Filing
299
ORDER denying 288 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/19/2011. c/m (cc: USCA re: CA #11-3341.) (TMA)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER denying 121 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 122 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 123 Motion for Reconsideration (S.E.) cm. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/3/2010. (MAC)
|
|
Filing
80
ENTRY Directing further proceedings; Third Party Plaintiffs shall have to 1/12/10 to show when and how service of process was effected on the Third Party Defendants and show cause why the action should not remanded as improperly removed (S.E.) cm. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 12/10/2009.(MAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
