HENSON v. FINNAN

HENSON v. FINNAN

Case Number:	1:2009cv01340
Filed:	October 27, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
Presiding Judge:	David Frank Hamilton
Presiding Judge:	Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 1, 2010	Filing 15 ORDER granting respondent's 11 Motion to Dismiss and Directing Entry of Judgment (S.O.) cm. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/1/2010. (MAC)
October 30, 2009	Filing 4 ENTRY AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - DISCIPLINE CASE. Plaintiff asserts eight claims. His first two claims must be summarily dismissed. These claims are that during the disciplinary proceedings, authorities violated state prison regulations and policies. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claims summarily dismissed in this Entry. The first two claims in the petition are dismissed pursuant to Rule 4. The respondent is directed to answer the allegations of claims 3 through 8 of the petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted as to those claims. This shall be done within 20 days after the date this Entry is signed. The petitioner shall have 20 days after service of such answer or return to order to show cause on him in which to reply. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 10/30/2009. c/m. (LBK)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 1, 2010

Filing 15 ORDER granting respondent's 11 Motion to Dismiss and Directing Entry of Judgment (S.O.) cm. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/1/2010. (MAC)

October 30, 2009

Filing 4 ENTRY AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - DISCIPLINE CASE. Plaintiff asserts eight claims. His first two claims must be summarily dismissed. These claims are that during the disciplinary proceedings, authorities violated state prison regulations and policies. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claims summarily dismissed in this Entry. The first two claims in the petition are dismissed pursuant to Rule 4. The respondent is directed to answer the allegations of claims 3 through 8 of the petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted as to those claims. This shall be done within 20 days after the date this Entry is signed. The petitioner shall have 20 days after service of such answer or return to order to show cause on him in which to reply. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 10/30/2009. c/m. (LBK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HENSON v. FINNAN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?