DUKES v. COX et al
Case Number: 1:2009cv01440
Filed: November 19, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: David Frank Hamilton
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 371 ORDER. Ms. Dukes' Motion to Set Aside or Stay Judgment or Order Pending Outcome of Appeal, [Filing No. 356], and Defendants' Motion to Strike Sealed Document, [Filing No. 366], are DENIED. The Court notes that Ms. Dukes filed a Notice of Appeal on August 19, 2015, [Filing No. 358], and that her appeal is proceeding before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/18/2015. Copy sent to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. (BGT)
July 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 354 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 351 Motion to Correct Error and Alternatively Relief from Judgment. Presently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Theresa L. Dukes' Motion to Correct Error And Alternatively For Relief from Judgment. [Filin g No. 351.] Ms. Dukes asks for relief from the Final Judgment this Court entered in favor of Defendants on May 15, 2015, [Filing No. 349], after dismissing Ms. Dukes' case with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(b) and 16(f), [Filing No. 348]. Defendants oppose Ms. Dukes' motion. [Filing No. 352; Filing No. 353.] For the reasons that follow, the Court denies Ms. Dukes' motion. [Filing No. 351]. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/22/2015. Copy sent to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. (BGT)
May 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 348 ORDER. For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS IN PART Defendants' motion, [Filing No. 325], such that Ms. Dukes' case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(b) and 16(f). Given that there wil l be not be a trial, Defendants' request to exclude Ms. Dukes' presentation of exhibits at trial is DENIED AS MOOT, as are all other motions and deadlines currently pending in this litigation. [Filing No. 329; Filing No. 335; Filing No. 337; Filing No. 338.] Final judgment shall issue accordingly. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/15/2015. Copy sent to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. (BGT)
April 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 310 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 307 Motion to Reconsider. The deadlines set forth in the Amended Final Pretrial Order, [Filing No. 304], remain in effect, subject to the two-week extension the Court already granted, [Filing No. 306]. The first d eadlines fall on April 17, 2015. The final pretrial conference remains scheduled for 9:00 a.m. on May 15, 2015, and the jury trial remains scheduled to begin on June 8, 2015. A copy of this entry is being emailed to Ms. Dukes to ensure its timely receipt, given the impending deadlines. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/16/2015. Copy sent to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail and Electronic Mail. (BGT)
August 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 206 ORDER granting 149 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment - For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS summary judgment in favor of the Defendants on Ms. Dukes' claim for civil conspiracy pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. [Dkt. 149.] Acco rdingly, Ms. Dukes' civil conspiracy claim against the Defendants is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This matter will proceed to trial on the remainder of Ms. Dukes' claims. No final judgment will issue at this time. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/27/2012. (copy to Theresa Dukes via US Mail) (JKS)
October 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 109 Order Following In Camera Review. Ms. Dukes is granted a protective order against providing any of the redacted information and records to the defendants, except for the information stated in the Order. For the revised redacted page 2, Ms. Dukes sha ll produce the revised document to the defendants within fourteen (14) days of this entry. The plaintiff's Request for Copy of Transcript and Request for Continuance of Response (Dkt. 108 ) is denied without prejudice in part and denied in part. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 10/17/2011. (LH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DUKES v. COX et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?