ISHII et al v. MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. 13 et al
1:2009cv01509 |
December 9, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
William T. Lawrence |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 65 ENTRY REGARDING MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT: Because the Plaintiffs assert no argument in the instant motion that was not or could not have been advanced in their objection to the Defendants' bill of costs, Rule 59 relief is not available to the Plaintiffs. Accordingly, the motion to alter judgment is DENIED 64 Motion to Amend/Correct ***SEE ENTRY***. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/30/2010. (DWH) |
Filing 63 ENTRY REGARDING BILL OF COSTS: The Defendants' request for costs in the amount of $350.00 is GRANTED and costs are taxed against the Plaintiffs and in favor of the Defendants in the amount of $350.00. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 7/27/2010. (DWH) |
Filing 58 CLOSED REMANDED - ENTRY REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT: Accordingly, this case is REMANDED to the Marion County Superior Court **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 3/18/2010.(DWH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: ISHII et al v. MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. 13 et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.