THOMPSON et al. v. K.R. DRENTH TRUCKING, INC. et al.
| JASON THOMPSON, DALE C. DAVIS, WILLIAM E. BARNES and MARK A. HAYDEN |
| KENNETH ANDRESEN, STEVEN RUCKERT, JOHN MCGEE, KENNETH S. DRENTH, THOMAS J. MANZKE and K.R. DRENTH TRUCKING, INC. |
| 1:2010cv00135 |
| February 2, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Larry J. McKinney |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
ENTRY - Defendants' Motion for Certification of Interlocutory Order Under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) (Dkt. 86 ) is DENIED. As for Defendant's companion Motion for Stay of Proceedings (Dkt. 88 ), this motion will be GRANTED. Defendants have 14 days from the day of this entry to comply with the Court's directive to produce the following: the names, addresses, telephone numbers, dates of employment, location of employment, and dates of birth of all potential plaintiffs, which at thi s time are limited to employees who work/have worked in KRDs Indianapolis operations (on or after January 18, 2007). This directive must be adhered to without exception. The Court is not inclined to entertain another motion to stay. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/7/2011. (JD)
|
|
Filing
84
ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO RECONSIDER - Defendants' Motion to Reconsider (Dkt. 78 ) is DENIED. In conjunction with their Motion to Reconsider, Defendants moved the Court to stay enforcement of the Court's order instructing Defenda nts to electronically produce certain information on potential class members within 30 days. Defendants' Motion to Stay (Dkt. 80 ) is GRANTED, and Defendants have 14 days from the day of this entry to comply with the Court's directive to produce the requisite information. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/3/2011. (JD)
|
|
Filing
77
ENTRY ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO RECONSIDER - Largely driven by the procedural posture of this case, the Court has resolved to GRANT Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. 69 ) and their underlying Motion for Conditional Certification (Dkt. 19 ). **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/15/2011. (JD)
|
|
Filing
68
ENTRY on Plaintiffs' Motion for Certification and Notice of Collective Action Lawsuit - Plaintiffs' Motion for Certification and Notice of Collective Action [Dkt. 19 ] is DENIED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/11/2011. (TRG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
