KERN v. STATE OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
| DOC Commissioner EDWIN BUSS, Commissioner (Res) J. DAVID DONAHUE, Classification Dir. GARY HARTSOCK, Case Manager DAVE M. KHALS, Parole Coordinator RICHARD McDONALD and STATE OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 1:2010cv00379 |
| March 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ENTRY - In his filing of June 4, 2010, the plaintiff objects to the court's order to collect the balance of $336.00 to pay the entire filing fee. The court's order directing monthly payments to collect the balance of the $350.00 filing fee for this action was proper. The plaintiff's filing of June 4, 2010, treated as an objection to that order, is overruled. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 6/24/2010.(TRG)
|
|
Filing
8
ENTRY and Order Directing Dismissal of Action: For the reasons just noted, Kerns complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and the dismissal of the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) is therefore mandatory. Gladney v. Pendleton Corr. Facility, 302 F.3d 773, 775 (7th Cir.2002). Judgment dismissing the action with prejudice shall now issue **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 5/20/2010.(DWH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
