UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. REID HOSPITAL & HEALTH CARE SERVICES, INC. et al
STATE OF INDIANA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CAROL COOTS |
REID PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES, INC, RESOLUTION CONSULTING, INC., RICHMOND CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. and REID HOSPITAL & HEALTH CARE SERVICES, INC. |
CAROL COOTS |
1:2010cv00526 |
April 2, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Tim A. Baker |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Other Statutory Actions |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 96 ORDER denying 90 Motion for Continuance - The Court DENIES Ms. Coots' Motion for Continuance of Trial and for Revision of Dates in the Case Management Plan, [dkt. 90 ]. The deadlines set forth in the Case Management Plan, [dkt. 75 ], and the February 3, 2014 trial date, [dkt. 79 ], remain in effect. ***SEE ORDER***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/19/2013. (JKS) |
Filing 95 ORDER granting Attorney General's 89 Motion to Quash (see Order). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 7/17/2013. (SWM) |
Filing 76 ORDER - Defendants' 64 Partial Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The allegations contained in paragraph 43 and paragraph 44 of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (including subparts) asserting that Defendants billed Medicare/Medicaid claims using inaccurate "place of service defaults," lack sufficient detail of fraud, as required by Rule 9(b), to sustain a claim under the FCA, and such a claim must be dismissed. However, Plaintiff has sufficiently pled claims for which relief may be granted in paragraphs 33 and 38, with regard to use of false diagnostic codes, and that claim remains, along with the others not subject to the motion, for further factual development and prosecution. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/10/2012. (JKS) |
Filing 55 ORDER on Defendant's 39 Motion to Dismiss - The parties agree that Ms. Coots' claim for Medicare and Medicaid Fraud pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7a should be dismissed. Therefore, the Court ORDERS Count III of Ms. Coots' C omplaint DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. For the reasons stated herein, the Court converts Defendants' motion to dismiss to a motion for more definite statement consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 (e) and GRANTS that motion. [Dkt. 39.] Ms. Coots has fourteen days to file an amended complaint that adequately pleads "the who, what, when, where, and how" of Defendants' alleged fraud. The Court's conversion of the Defendants' motion is without prejudice to Defendants' right to file any motion pursuant to Rules 9(b) and 12(b) in response to Ms. Coots' amended complaint. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/2/2012. (JKS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.