O'NEILL v ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
Plaintiff: DAVID O'NEILL
Defendant: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION and ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS OPERATIONS, INC.
Case Number: 1:2010cv00964
Filed: July 29, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 145 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF COSTS AND RELATED MATTERS - The referral to the Magistrate Judge of Promote's latest challenge to the award of costs is VACATED [Docket No. 142 ], as it is apparent that Promote is really seeking reconsideration of the District Judge's prior ruling on costs. Promote's motion for leave to file a second supplemental brief in support of its motion to retax costs [Docket No. 143 ] is DENIED, as Roche's objections to that motio n are well taken. [Docket No. 144 .] As set forth, the Court declines to reconsider or otherwise modify its prior order on costs. Accordingly, Promote's motion for review of costs taxed by Clerk [Docket No. 134 ], as well as the request for additional costs set forth in Roche's response brief [Docket No. 135 ], are DENIED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/29/2012. (JD)
August 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 132 ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S SUBMISSION ON BILLS OF COSTS - Defendant's Bill of Costs (Dkt. 125 ) shall be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court finds that Defendant is entitled to recover under 28 U.S.C. §1920 the sum of $10,040.09. Costs will be taxed in Defendant's favor on their bill of costs in the total sum of $10,040.09. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/9/2011.(JD)
June 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ENTRY ON MOTION TO DISMISS - For the reasons set forth, Roche's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 74 ) is GRANTED. Given the Court's decision, Roche's other Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 106 ) and Motion to Bifurcate (Dkt. 82 ) are DENIED AS MOOT. **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/3/2011. (JD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: O'NEILL v ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID O'NEILL
Represented By: John Paul Bjork
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
Represented By: Daniel Paul Albers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS OPERATIONS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?