O'NEILL v ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
DAVID O'NEILL |
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION and ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS OPERATIONS, INC. |
1:2010cv00964 |
July 29, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Tim A. Baker |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 145 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF COSTS AND RELATED MATTERS - The referral to the Magistrate Judge of Promote's latest challenge to the award of costs is VACATED [Docket No. 142 ], as it is apparent that Promote is really seeking reconsideration of the District Judge's prior ruling on costs. Promote's motion for leave to file a second supplemental brief in support of its motion to retax costs [Docket No. 143 ] is DENIED, as Roche's objections to that motio n are well taken. [Docket No. 144 .] As set forth, the Court declines to reconsider or otherwise modify its prior order on costs. Accordingly, Promote's motion for review of costs taxed by Clerk [Docket No. 134 ], as well as the request for additional costs set forth in Roche's response brief [Docket No. 135 ], are DENIED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/29/2012. (JD) |
Filing 132 ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S SUBMISSION ON BILLS OF COSTS - Defendant's Bill of Costs (Dkt. 125 ) shall be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court finds that Defendant is entitled to recover under 28 U.S.C. §1920 the sum of $10,040.09. Costs will be taxed in Defendant's favor on their bill of costs in the total sum of $10,040.09. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/9/2011.(JD) |
Filing 122 ENTRY ON MOTION TO DISMISS - For the reasons set forth, Roche's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 74 ) is GRANTED. Given the Court's decision, Roche's other Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 106 ) and Motion to Bifurcate (Dkt. 82 ) are DENIED AS MOOT. **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/3/2011. (JD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.