COLUMBUS REGIONAL HOSPITAL v. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Indiana Southern District COLUMBUS REGIONAL HOSPITAL v. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION

COLUMBUS REGIONAL HOSPITAL v. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION

Plaintiff:	COLUMBUS REGIONAL HOSPITAL
Defendant:	FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Case Number:	1:2010cv01168
Filed:	September 15, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge:	Sarah Evans Barker
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 28, 2012	Filing 106 ORDER denying 60 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of and Objection to Magistrate Judge's August 9, 2011 Order on Motions. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/28/2012. (PGS)
August 9, 2011	Filing 58 ORDER denying CRH's 43 Motion for a Continuance to Allow Discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P.56(d); denying CHR's 13 Motion to Enter Plaintiff's Case Management Plan ("CMP"); granting FEMA's 15 Motion Regarding CMP and to Stay Discovery pending resolution of its Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment. Discovery in this matter is hereby stayed pending resolution of FEMA's pending motion.[Dkt. 15]. The Court, sua sponte, hereby enlarges the time for CRH to respond to FEMA's Second Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment to and including September 9, 2011 (see Order). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 8/9/2011. (SWM)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 28, 2012

Filing 106 ORDER denying 60 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of and Objection to Magistrate Judge's August 9, 2011 Order on Motions. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/28/2012. (PGS)

August 9, 2011

Filing 58 ORDER denying CRH's 43 Motion for a Continuance to Allow Discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P.56(d); denying CHR's 13 Motion to Enter Plaintiff's Case Management Plan ("CMP"); granting FEMA's 15 Motion Regarding CMP and to Stay Discovery pending resolution of its Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment. Discovery in this matter is hereby stayed pending resolution of FEMA's pending motion.[Dkt. 15]. The Court, sua sponte, hereby enlarges the time for CRH to respond to FEMA's Second Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment to and including September 9, 2011 (see Order). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 8/9/2011. (SWM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: COLUMBUS REGIONAL HOSPITAL v. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: COLUMBUS REGIONAL HOSPITAL
Represented By:	Brent W. Huber
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?