COMPTON v. ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Indiana Southern District COMPTON v. ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

COMPTON v. ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Plaintiff:	JILL COMPTON
Defendant:	ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Case Number:	1:2010cv01448
Filed:	November 12, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Debra McVicker Lynch
Presiding Judge:	Larry J. McKinney
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 25, 2012	Filing 51 ORDER granting IN PART Deft's 47 Motion for Reconsideration (See Order for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 1/25/2012. (SWM)
December 13, 2011	Filing 41 Order Following In Camera Review. The only redactions that Allstate may maintain are those identified in this order on pages five (seven entries redacted on work product grounds) and seven and eight (list of entries redacted on attorney-client privi lege grounds). All other portions of the NextGen report must be produced. Allstate must produce the NextGen report, with the revised redactions as provided in this order, by December 28, 2011. Because the new version of the NextGen report reveals sig nificantly more information than Ms. Compton had available to her when Mr. Schaefer was first deposed and because Mr. Schaefer's testimony established that his recollection about various matters may be refreshed by entries in the NextGen report that had been redacted, Ms. Compton may resume the deposition of Mr. Schaefer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 12/13/2011. (LH)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 25, 2012

Filing 51 ORDER granting IN PART Deft's 47 Motion for Reconsideration (See Order for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 1/25/2012. (SWM)

December 13, 2011

Filing 41 Order Following In Camera Review. The only redactions that Allstate may maintain are those identified in this order on pages five (seven entries redacted on work product grounds) and seven and eight (list of entries redacted on attorney-client privi lege grounds). All other portions of the NextGen report must be produced. Allstate must produce the NextGen report, with the revised redactions as provided in this order, by December 28, 2011. Because the new version of the NextGen report reveals sig nificantly more information than Ms. Compton had available to her when Mr. Schaefer was first deposed and because Mr. Schaefer's testimony established that his recollection about various matters may be refreshed by entries in the NextGen report that had been redacted, Ms. Compton may resume the deposition of Mr. Schaefer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 12/13/2011. (LH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: COMPTON v. ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: JILL COMPTON
Represented By:	William E. Winingham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?