SMITH v. PENSKE CHEVROLET

SMITH v. PENSKE CHEVROLET

Plaintiff:	ROBERT SMITH
Defendant:	PENSKE CHEVROLET
Case Number:	1:2010cv01706
Filed:	December 23, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge:	William T. Lawrence
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 8, 2012	Filing 43 ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: For the reasons articulated above, the Defendant's motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff Rob Smith's sexual harassment claim is GRANTED. Because the Plaintiff has not brought an FMLA claim, the Defendant's motion for summary judgment as to that claim is DENIED AS MOOT. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Plaintiff's slander and defamation claims, which are accordingly DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. As one final note, the Court's docket has incorrectly referred to the Plaintiff as "Robert" throughout this litigation when the Plaintiff filed his complaint under the name "Rob." The Court directs the Clerk to correct the error on its docket *SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION*. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 5/8/2012. Copy to Rob Smith via US Mail. (DW) Modified on 5/8/2012 (DW).
June 23, 2011	Filing 20 ENTRY Discussing Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings: Penske's motion for judgment on the pleadings 13 is granted. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claims resolved in this Entry. The parties shall submit a propose d case management plan not later than July 20, 2011, and shall incorporate in such document the deadline of October 14, 2011, for the filing of any further dispositive motions. Other deadlines shall be proposed consistent with the Octob er 14th deadline. Penske shall be correctly identified in the caption as D. Young Chevrolet, LLC, dba Penske Chevrolet, and the docket and future filings shall reflect this correction *SEE ENTRY*. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 6/23/2011.(DWH)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 8, 2012

Filing 43 ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: For the reasons articulated above, the Defendant's motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff Rob Smith's sexual harassment claim is GRANTED. Because the Plaintiff has not brought an FMLA claim, the Defendant's motion for summary judgment as to that claim is DENIED AS MOOT. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Plaintiff's slander and defamation claims, which are accordingly DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. As one final note, the Court's docket has incorrectly referred to the Plaintiff as "Robert" throughout this litigation when the Plaintiff filed his complaint under the name "Rob." The Court directs the Clerk to correct the error on its docket ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 5/8/2012. Copy to Rob Smith via US Mail. (DW) Modified on 5/8/2012 (DW).

June 23, 2011

Filing 20 ENTRY Discussing Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings: Penske's motion for judgment on the pleadings 13 is granted. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claims resolved in this Entry. The parties shall submit a propose d case management plan not later than July 20, 2011, and shall incorporate in such document the deadline of October 14, 2011, for the filing of any further dispositive motions. Other deadlines shall be proposed consistent with the Octob er 14th deadline. Penske shall be correctly identified in the caption as D. Young Chevrolet, LLC, dba Penske Chevrolet, and the docket and future filings shall reflect this correction ***SEE ENTRY***. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 6/23/2011.(DWH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SMITH v. PENSKE CHEVROLET
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT SMITH
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: PENSKE CHEVROLET
Represented By:	Jeffrey B. Halbert
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?