AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILL INSTALLATION & CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
| AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY |
| PRO CARPET, MILL INSTALLATION & CONSTRUCTION, INC., HOME DEPOT, HARVEY MARKLEY and CREW2, INC. |
| PRO CARPET and HOME DEPOT |
| AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 1:2010cv01711 |
| December 27, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ENTRY ON MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS - Plaintiff's 29 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on Defendants' counterclaims is GRANTED with respect to Counterclaimants breach of contract claims but DENIED (for now) with respect to their i ndemnification claims. American Family also seeks costs and fees for defending against these claims. The Court will defer making a determination as to the appropriateness of costs and fees. American Family may renew their request for costs and fees after the indemnification claims have been resolved. **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/21/2011. (JD)
|
|
Filing
68
ENTRY ON CREW2'S MOTIONS TO DISMISS - For the reasons set forth, Crew2's Motions to Dismiss (dkt. 17 and dkt. 55 ) are DENIED. **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/19/2011. (JD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
