LAFAVERS v. USA

LAFAVERS v. USA

Petitioner:	KEVEN M. LAFAVERS
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	1:2011cv00131
Filed:	January 27, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge:	Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 16, 2011	Filing 16 ORDER denying 15 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/16/2011. Copy via US Mail to LaFavers. (cc: USCA re: CA #11-3542.) (TMA)
October 6, 2011	Filing 9 ORDER on Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) and Denying Certificate of Appealability - For the reasons explained in this Entry, the motion of Keven LaFavers for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 must be denied and the actio n dismissed with prejudice. In addition, the court finds that a certificate of appealability should not issue. The motion for relief pursuant to § 2255 is therefore DENIED. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. The court therefore DENIES a certificate of appealability. (copy to Movant via US Mail). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/6/2011. (JKS) Modified on 10/7/2011 (JKS).

Date Filed

Document Text

November 16, 2011

Filing 16 ORDER denying 15 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/16/2011. Copy via US Mail to LaFavers. (cc: USCA re: CA #11-3542.) (TMA)

October 6, 2011

Filing 9 ORDER on Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) and Denying Certificate of Appealability - For the reasons explained in this Entry, the motion of Keven LaFavers for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 must be denied and the actio n dismissed with prejudice. In addition, the court finds that a certificate of appealability should not issue. The motion for relief pursuant to § 2255 is therefore DENIED. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. The court therefore DENIES a certificate of appealability. (copy to Movant via US Mail). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/6/2011. (JKS) Modified on 10/7/2011 (JKS).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LAFAVERS v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: KEVEN M. LAFAVERS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By:	Gerald A. Coraz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?