PARKER v. ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC
| DANNY K. PARKER |
| ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC |
| SHEEHAN PIPE LINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY |
| 1:2011cv00139 |
| January 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
144
ORDER - The Court, having read said motion and being duly advised, GRANTS Plaintiff's motion. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants, Pe Ben, USA, Inc. and Shaw Pipeline Services Inc., is DISMISSED from this case without prejudice and that the case caption is AMENDED to reflect the dismissal of these Defendants from this case. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/15/2012.(CKM)
|
|
Filing
141
ORDER granting 107 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant Brandenburg's Affirmative Defense Nos. 4 and 5. Defendant Brandenburg is granted 45 days within which to seek leave to amend its Answer to conform to the court's ruling. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/5/2012. (PGS)
|
|
Filing
139
ORDER - denying 84 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike. Sheehan may seek leave to amend its Answer to name all entities which may be subject to its chosen nonparty defenses through the close of discovery on November 10, 2012. *** SEE ORDER ***. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/28/2012. (CKM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
