YOUNG-PERRY v. ELI LILY & COMPANY

YOUNG-PERRY v. ELI LILY & COMPANY

Plaintiff:	ROSALIND YOUNG-PERRY
Defendant:	ELI LILY & COMPANY
Case Number:	1:2011cv00302
Filed:	February 28, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Debra McVicker Lynch
Presiding Judge:	Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 8, 2011	Filing 38 ENTRY addressing the Plaintiffs' Responses to the Court's Show Cause Orders issued in case 1:11-cv-00302-TWP-DML at Dkt. 29 and case 1:11-cv-00307-SEB-DKLat Dkt. 22; denying (34) Motion for Leave to File Complaint in case 1:11-cv-00302-TWP- DML; and denying (26) Motion for Leave to File Complaint in case 1:11-cv-00307-SEB-DKL. Ms. Avery-Hanley shall serve both plaintiffs with a copy of this Entry and file proof that she has done so in accordance with the directions on page 10 of this r uling. Ms. Avery-Hanley shall also have through and including December 23, 2011, to either: (a) voluntarily withdraw her appearances; or (b) show cause why she should not be discharged by the Court and her appearances stricken. Plaintiffs are admon ished that if Ms. Avery-Hanley voluntarily withdraws her appearances or is discharged by the Court, they will need to act in accordance with the directions on page 10 of this ruling to promptly secure replacement counsel. Jointly signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt and Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 12/8/2011. (PGS)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 8, 2011

Filing 38 ENTRY addressing the Plaintiffs' Responses to the Court's Show Cause Orders issued in case 1:11-cv-00302-TWP-DML at Dkt. 29 and case 1:11-cv-00307-SEB-DKLat Dkt. 22; denying (34) Motion for Leave to File Complaint in case 1:11-cv-00302-TWP- DML; and denying (26) Motion for Leave to File Complaint in case 1:11-cv-00307-SEB-DKL. Ms. Avery-Hanley shall serve both plaintiffs with a copy of this Entry and file proof that she has done so in accordance with the directions on page 10 of this r uling. Ms. Avery-Hanley shall also have through and including December 23, 2011, to either: (a) voluntarily withdraw her appearances; or (b) show cause why she should not be discharged by the Court and her appearances stricken. Plaintiffs are admon ished that if Ms. Avery-Hanley voluntarily withdraws her appearances or is discharged by the Court, they will need to act in accordance with the directions on page 10 of this ruling to promptly secure replacement counsel. Jointly signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt and Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 12/8/2011. (PGS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: YOUNG-PERRY v. ELI LILY & COMPANY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROSALIND YOUNG-PERRY
Represented By:	Marcia E. Avery-Hanley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: ELI LILY & COMPANY
Represented By:	Jamenda A. McCoy
Represented By:	Ellen E. Boshkoff
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?