WALTON v. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, et al.
| DEBORAH WALTON |
| CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. |
| 1:2011cv00417 |
| March 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
176
ORDER - To date, Ms. Walton has not responded to the Court's Order to Show Cause. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f), the Court GRANTS summary judgment in favor of Chase on Ms. Walton's RESPA accounting claim, Count VIII. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/15/2013. (JKS)
|
|
Filing
168
ORDER - The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Ms. Walton's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, [dkt. 100 ]. The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Chase's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts V and VI, [dkt. 120 ]. M s. Walton's Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply Brief in Opposition to Defendant Chase Home Finance, LLC's Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Under Local Rule 56.1(d), [dkt. 162 ], is DENIED AS MOOT. As to Ms. Walton's claim for an "accounting" under RESPA (Count VIII), the Court ORDERS Ms. Walton to SHOW CAUSE by December 28, 2012 why the Court should not grant summary judgment in favor of Chase on that claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f) because it does not appear that RESPA recognizes a claim for an accounting. The Court notes several upcoming deadlines set forth in the Case Management Plan and subsequent Orders, and expects the parties to strictly comply with all of those deadlines. Any failur e to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions. The Court further requests that the magistrate judge confer with the parties in the very near future to ascertain whether an agreed resolution is possible. (SEE ENTRY) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/18/2012. (JKS)
|
|
Filing
166
ORDER - The Court GRANTS Chase's Motion to Deny Plaintiff's Request for Default Judgment and to Allow Chase to File Its Belated Answer to First Amended Complaint, [dkt. 153 ], and DENIES AS MOOT Ms. Walton's Motion for Entry of Def ault Against Defendant Chase Home Finance, LLC Under Rule 55(a), [dkt. 156 ], and Motion for Default Against Defendant Chase Home Finance, LLC Under Rule 55(b), [dkt. 159 ]. The Court directs the Clerk to docket Chase's Answer to First Amended Complaint, currently appearing at dkt. 153 -1, as a separate docket entry immediately following entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/6/2012. (JKS)
|
|
Filing
149
MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore: Discovery Hearing held on 9/7/2012. This matter came before the Court for a hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Respons e to Plaintiff's Interrogatory No. 21. [Dkt. 140.] Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, 140 , is hereby GRANTED; however, in light of the Supplemental Response to Plaintiff's Interrogatory No. 21, no furthe r response to Interrogatory No. 21 is required. The Court Orders Plaintiff to submit a petition setting forth her expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurre d in making the Motion to Compel within seven days of the date of this Order. During the hearing, the Court also addressed Defendant's Motion for Protective Order. [Dkt. 139.] Plaintiff's coun sel represented that Plaintiff would not object to that motion. Accordingly, the motion will be granted by separate order (see Entry for additional information). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore.(SWM)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER denying Pltf's 75 Motion to Disqualify Counsel (SEE ORDER). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 4/23/2012. (SWM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
