TRUFOODS, LLC v. RIGDON et al
| TRUFOODS, LLC |
| CATHERINE HENDRYX, PREMIER FOOD SERVICES, LLC, MICHAEL RIGDON and CONEY ISLAND CUSTARD & DOGS LLC |
| TRUFOODS, LLC |
| PREMIER FOOD SERVICES, LLC, MICHAEL RIGDON, CATHERINE HENDRYX and CONEY ISLAND CUSTARD & DOGS LLC |
| 1:2011cv00446 |
| April 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report Recommendation and any objections, approves and adopts the Magistrate Judge's 64 Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, Plaintiff& #039;s motion, Docket No. 59 , is granted in part and denied in part. The Court enters default against Hendryx on Plaintiff's claims and dismisses Hendryx's counterclaims with prejudice. Consistent with the Report and Recommendation, R igdon shall produce any additional documents responsive to the inadequacies outlined in the Report and Recommendation within twenty-one days from the date of this adoption. Plaintiff shall submit its fee petition to the Court within fourteen days from the date of this adoption. (copies to Premier Food, Catherine Hendryx, Michael Rigdon and Coney Island via US Mail). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/28/2012. (JKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
