BOWMAN et al v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION et al
| JAMES BOWMAN and MELISSA GIBSON |
| PHOENIX DATA CORPORATION, ACS HUMAN SERVICES, LLC, ARBOR E&T, LLC and INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION |
| 1:2011cv00593 |
| May 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Richard L. Young |
| P.I.: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
301
ENTRY OVERRULING 289 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court striking the two expert reply reports. Accordingly, the stayed briefing on Plaintiffs' motion for class certification and Defendants' motions to exclude Dr. Goldstein's and Dr. Thomasson's opinions pending resolution of this motion 288 is lifted and the reply briefs for both motions shall be filed within 14 days. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 5/2/2013. (PG)
|
|
Filing
284
ORDER granting Defendants' 274 Motion to Strike Reply Reports of Dr. Goldstein and Dr. Thomasson. The stayed briefing on Plaintiffs' motion for class certification and Defendants' motions to exclude Dr. Goldstein's and Dr. Thomasson's opinions pending resolution of this motion [See Docket No. 269] is lifted and the reply briefs for both motions shall be filed within 14 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 12/18/2012. (MAC)
|
|
Filing
280
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS TO SEAL: Plaintiffs' motion to seal 204 is granted in part and denied in part; Plaintiffs' motion 216 is denied; Plaintiffs' motion 222 is denied; Plaintiff s' motion 226 is denied; Plaintiffs' motion 235 is denied; Plaintiffs' motion 240 is granted; Plaintiffs' motion 254 is denied; Defendants' motion to seal 249 is denied; Plaintiffs' motion to seal 263 granted in part (see Order for details) Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 10/25/2012. (SWM)
|
|
Filing
279
ORDER granting in part and denying in part ACS's 158 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Plaintiffs' breach of contract claim is dismissed, but Plaintiffs are not required to pay costs or attorneys' fees. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 10/23/2012. (PG)
|
|
Filing
177
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER ON MARCH 22, 2012, TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE: The parties appeared by counsel on March 22, 2012, for a telephonic status conference. Argument was held regarding two discovery disputes. Following the hearing, the parties submitted five page briefs. [Docket Nos. 163, 166.] The Court now addresses these issues (see Order). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 4/26/2012.(SWM)
|
|
Filing
147
Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker: Pretrial Conference held on 2/7/2012. Court heard argument on case management and discovery-related issues and motions. At the heart of the argument was Plaintiffs' motion to extend Case Management Plan deadlines [Docket No. 135], which seeks to extend all CMP deadlines by 90 days. Plaintiffs' motion to extend CMP deadlines 135 is granted, and all CMP deadlines are enlarged by 90 days (see Order for additional information). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker.(SWM)
|
|
Filing
146
ORDER granting Defendant's 41 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Claims for Breach of Contract. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 2/21/2012. (PG)
|
|
Filing
130
ENTRY Regarding Protective Order Dispute: The parties have worked cooperatively to put a protective order in place to permit purportedly "confidential" documents to be so designated and possibly filed under seal. However, the parties dispu te what deadline should be set for when an objection must be raised to a confidentiality designation. Defendants assert that Plaintiffs should raise any such objection within 90 days of production. Plaintiffs contend that the duty to object should no t be triggered until the document is actually filed with the Court. On December 7, 2011, the Court held a telephonic status conference at which counsel was heard on this dispute. The Court now addresses this issue, and a few additional related items (see Entry for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 12/8/2011. (SWM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
