TINKHAM v. STINE et al
DAVID TINKHAM |
U.S. PAROLE BOARD and INDIANA BOARD OF PAROLE |
DONALD L. STINE |
1:2011cv00604 |
May 5, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Mark J. Dinsmore |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Entry Discussing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Denying Certificate of Appealability - David Tinkham's request to proceed in forma pauperis shows that he has sufficient funds to pay the $5.00 filing fee. He shall have through June 2 , 2011, in which to do so. His request to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 2 ) is DENIED. For the reasons explained in this Entry, Tinkham's petition for writ of habeas corpus must be DENIED and the action DISMISSED with prejudice. Tinkham& #039;s motion for declaratory judgment (Dkt. No. 4 ) and motion for injunction (Dkt. No. 5 ) are also DENIED. In addition, the court finds that a certificate of appealability should not issue. **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/12/2011. (JD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.