STUART et al v. CHIN et al
Plaintiff: ROBERT R. STUART and ROBERT R. STUART, LLC
Defendant: QINS, INC., MARCIA CHIN, TOLA E. CHIN, SR. and TOLA R. CHIN, JR.
Case Number: 1:2011cv00686
Filed: May 20, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER granting 23 Motion for Leave to file a second amended complaint. By December 27, 2011, the parties must SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why this case should not be remanded to the Hamilton Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (See Order) Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 12/13/2011. (TMA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STUART et al v. CHIN et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT R. STUART
Represented By: Robert A. Garelick
Represented By: COHEN GARELICK & GLAZIER
Represented By: Joshua Thornton Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT R. STUART, LLC
Represented By: Robert A. Garelick
Represented By: COHEN GARELICK & GLAZIER
Represented By: Joshua Thornton Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: QINS, INC.
Represented By: Monica Renee Brownewell Smith
Represented By: Andrew J. Detherage
Represented By: Eric B. Zimbelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARCIA CHIN
Represented By: Eric B. Zimbelman
Represented By: Andrew J. Detherage
Represented By: Monica Renee Brownewell Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TOLA E. CHIN, SR.
Represented By: Monica Renee Brownewell Smith
Represented By: Andrew J. Detherage
Represented By: Eric B. Zimbelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TOLA R. CHIN, JR.
Represented By: Monica Renee Brownewell Smith
Represented By: Andrew J. Detherage
Represented By: Eric B. Zimbelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?