TURPEN v. ASTRUE
| RUSSELL W. TURPEN |
| MICHAEL J. ASTRUE |
| SSA (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2011cv00729 |
| May 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER denying 32 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees - Even though the Court ordered a remand, the Court finds that the Commissioner was substantially justified in its denial of Mr. Turpen's benefits and in its defense of that denial in this matter. Accordingly, the Fee Petition, [dkt. 32 ], is DENIED. (SEE ORDER). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/24/2013. (JKS)
|
|
Filing
30
ENTRY Reviewing The Commissioner's Decision - Because an issue of fact remains as to whether Mr. Turpen timely submitted his military records and, if so, the impact of those records on his disability application and because the ALJ failed to build a logical bridge as to how Mr. Turpen's work history can be viewed as "successful," the Court VACATES the denial of benefits and REMANDS this matter back to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Final judgment will now issue. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/13/2012. (JKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
