TAMA PLASTIC INDUSTRY v. PRITCHETT TWINE & NET WRAP, LLC et al
| TAMA PLASTIC INDUSTRY |
| PRITCHETT TWINE & NET WRAP, LLC, PRITCHETT TWINE, NET WRAP & AG SALES, BALE SUPPLY, LLC, JJ PRITCHETT, JOSEPH PRITCHETT, JERALD PRITCHETT, JAMES BROWN and ZACHARY BROWN |
| 1:2011cv00783 |
| June 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
189
CLOSED TRANSFER - Tama's request that this Court give preclusive effect to its venue stipulation with the Pritchett Defendants is denied. [Dkt. 109 .] After considering the applicable factors and the parties' responses to the Court� 39;s proposed transfer, the Court concludes it is appropriate to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. For the reasons detailed herein, the interest of justice factor is dispositive, and the addition al factors either do not weigh against transfer or further support it. Because the District of Nebraska is the superior forum for this litigation, the Clerk is directed to TRANSFER this action to that Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a). T he Pritchett Defendants' Motion to Stay Litigation will remain pending for the transferee court to rule on, although it will be terminated as a pending motion on this Court's docket. Any previously ordered dates and deadlines are VACATED and any other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. (SEE ORDER). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/11/2012. (JKS)
|
|
Filing
180
AMENDED ORDER Denying Request For Preliminary Injunction - For the reasons detailed herein, the Court STRIKES Mr. Chi's affidavit, [dkt. 72 ], and GRANTS Tama's Motion to Consider Arguments Related to Defendants' Surreply, [dkt. [ 116]]. The Court DENIES Tama's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction based on its analysis of the applicable factors. [Dkt. 58 .] Pritchett's Motion to Stay Litigation Pending Reexamination of the Patent-in-Suit, [dkt. 69 ], remains UNDER ADVISEMENT. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/9/2012. (JKS)
|
|
Filing
171
ORDER: In light of Tama's concern, the Court has temporarily restricted the access of its Order denying Tama's request for a preliminary injunction to case participants. [Dkt. 169.] For the time being, the parties should treat that Order a s confidential material pursuant to their joint protective order. [Dkt. 42.] Given the strong presumption in favor of public access to court filings, however, the Court ORDERS each party to file a statement by August 8, 2012, specifically setting fo rth any portion of the Order the party believes should be maintained under seal, what harm will result from disclosure, why that harm is the sort that presents a legal justification for secrecy, and what legal precedent supports maintaining that port ion under seal. The Court notes that the precedent it details herein describes the standards for sealing documents submitted to the Court, not for sealing portions of a Court's order. The Court found no authority for permanently sealing access to an order in the short time it had to address this issue. Therefore, if a party desires to maintain any portion of the Order under seal, it should also direct the Court to applicable legal authority for doing so, keeping in mind that the Court's Order conveyed the dispositive information that was necessary to address the arguments raised by the parties ***SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/3/2012.(DW)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 77 Motion for Sanctions. (See order for specific details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Denise K. LaRue on 5/25/2012. (REO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
