ROWE v. HYSELL et al
| JEFFREY ALLEN ROWE |
| LISA GIBSON, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HYSELL, MARY MANSFIELD, DOCTOR MITCHIEF, WAYNE SCAIFE and ROSE VAISVILAS |
| 1:2011cv00975 |
| July 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
149
ENTRY - Granting Defendants Wayne Scaife and Rose Vaisvilas' Motion for Summary Judgment; This Entry does not resolve all claims against all parties. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claims resolved in this Entry. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 4/22/2014. Copy Mailed. (CKM)
|
|
Filing
136
Entry - Granting Gibson's Second Motion for Summary Judgment; This Entry resolves all claims against Ms. Gibson, but not all claims against all parties. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/4/2013. Copy Mailed. (CKM)
|
|
Filing
124
ENTRY - Denying Plaintiff's Second Motion for Summary Judgment; Rowe has failed to show that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, his second motion for summary judgment [Dkt. No. 82] is denied. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 5/15/2013. Copy Mailed. (CKM)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER granting Defendants' 50 Motion for Summary Judgment. The defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the claim that they were deliberately indifferent to Rowe's serious medical needs. This ruling, however, does not resolve all claims against Gibson nor does it resolve all claims against other parties. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claims resolved in this Entry. (See Entry). Copy mailed. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/26/2013. (MAC)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER denying 36 Plaintiff's Motion - Given the medical records that exist and Rowe's ability to testify on his own behalf regarding the symptoms he experienced, appointing an expert witness would not substantially aid the court. Rowe's motion to appoint an expert 36 is denied. (SEE ENTRY). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/24/2012. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail) (JKS)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER - denying 45 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 45 Motion for TRO. *** SEE ORDER***. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 7/25/2012. Copy Mailed. (CKM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
