CARLYLE v. FOGARTY et al
| DENNIS WAYNE CARLYLE |
| MICHAEL SPEARS, BRADLEY CRAIG and MICHAEL FOGARTY |
| 1:2011cv01151 |
| August 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 70 Motion to Amend or Reconsider Judgment (see Order). Copy via U S Mail to the Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/2/2013. (SWM)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER granting 44 Spears' and Craigs' Motion for Summary Judgment - Carlyle has not identified a genuine issue of material fact as to any of his claims against Chief Spears and Officer Craig. Accordingly, their motion for summary judg ment 44 must be granted. The motion for entry of judgment against plaintiff for his failure to respond 66 is denied as unnecessary. Summary judgment is also being granted in favor of defendant Michael Fogarty (Dkt. # 67 ). All claims have now been resolved. Judgment dismissing the action with prejudice shall now issue. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/20/2013. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail) (JKS)
|
|
Filing
31
ENTRY Discussing Motion for Reconsideration - The request for reconsideration 30 is denied, because the court made a correct ruling on the plaintiffs motion to amend and no persuasive basis for reconsidering that ruling has been shown. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/9/2012. (JKS)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER denying 25 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel - The plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel has been considered. The plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (dkt 25) is denied. (SEE ENTRY). (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/5/2012. (JKS)
|
|
Filing
4
ENTRY Discussing Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is granted to the extent that he shall be permitted to pay the filing fee in ten installments of $35.00. The first such installment shall be paid no later than November 21, 2011, and each installment thereafter shall be paid on or before the 20th day of each subsequent month. The full filing fee is $350.00. As submitted, certain claims must be dismissed for fail ure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Any claim for damages asserted directly under the Indiana Constitution is dismissed because there is no private cause of action for damages under the Indiana Constitution. The clerk is designate d, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), to issue and serve process on the defendants in the manner specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1). Process shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms and this Entry. (SEE ENTRY). (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/13/2011. (JKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
