HUGHES v. KORE OF INDIANA ENTERPRISE, INC.
| DAVID HUGHES |
| KORE OF INDIANA ENTERPRISE, INC. |
| 1:2011cv01329 |
| September 30, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
ORDER Decertifying Class - The Court VACATES its previous Order granting Mr. Hughes' motion to certify this action as a class action, [dkt. 65 ], and herby DECERTIFIES this action as a class action. The Court will adjudicate Mr. Hugh es' Complaint as an individual action and requests that the Magistrate Judge hold a conference with the parties to determine whether settlement is feasible and, if not, dates that the parties are available for trial. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/10/2013. (JKS)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER - The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to conduct whatever research is necessary and to provide a report to the Court by June 26, 2013, detailing a plan to either provide individual notice to the class members or to provide relevant legal authority supporting his position that such notice is not required. ***SEE ORDER***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/10/2013. (JKS)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER To File Joint Report - The parties' recent pretrial filings have caused the Court to question the propriety of proceeding with the scheduled jury trial in this action on June 24, 2013. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties to file a joint report by May 21, 2013, addressing the following issues. If they cannot agree on the contents of a joint report, competing reports must be filed by that date. ***SEE ORDER***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/16/2013. (JKS)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 72 Hughes' Motion for Summary Judgment - Kore will not be able to assert the following defenses in this litigation: waiver, estoppel, good faith, bona fide error, laches, reasonable procedures, or t hat Mr. Hughes was not a consumer under the EFTA. The Court denies Mr. Hughes' motion to the extent that it seeks summary judgment on Kore's safe-harbor defense under 15 U.S.C. § 1693h(d). The Court requests that the magistrate judge conduct a status conference to determine the future course of proceedings in light of the Court's interpretation of the safe harbor provision. ***SEE ORDER***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/12/2013. (JKS)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER denying Society Insurance's 84 Motion to Intervene (see Order). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 1/25/2013. (SWM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HUGHES v. KORE OF INDIANA ENTERPRISE, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DAVID HUGHES | |
| Represented By: | Ryan R. Frasher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: KORE OF INDIANA ENTERPRISE, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Judy L. Woods |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
