LONG v. WHITE et al
| BOBBY RAY LONG |
| GREG BALLARD, LEE HOARD, JOHN AND JANE DOE NUMBERS ONE THROUGH TWO HUNDRED, JOHN LAYTON, KENNETH WHIPKER and CHRISTOPHER WHITE |
| 1:2012cv00032 |
| January 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ENTRY DISCUSSING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS: For the reasons set forth above, Dr. Rohana's motion for summary judgment [dkt. 83] is granted as to the claim that Dr. Rohana was deliberately in different to his request for transfer to the VA Hospital for surgery scheduled on August 17, 2011. The motion for summary judgment [dkt. 83] is denied with respect to Dr. Rohana's failure to provide pain medication for 11 days while Long was con fined at the Jail. This remaining claim shall proceed to trial. Based on a new case filed by Mr. Long in No. 1:14-cv-01353-SEB-DKL, the clerk shall update the docket to add the address 1405 N. Colorado Street, Indianapolis, IN 46201 as a second addr ess for Mr. Long. Mr. Long must confirm his current address not later than September 12, 2014, and is admonished to report any future changes of address within seven days of the change. The Magistrate Judge is requested to schedule a status conference to revisit the issue of settlement and if that is not feasible, then to direct preparations for trial ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/2/2014. Copy sent via US Mail. (DW)
|
|
Filing
45
ENTRY - Plaintiff Bobby Ray Long's motion for leave to amend his civil rights complaint 37 is granted. The clerk is directed to re-docket the tendered amended complaint [37-1] as the amended complaint. Defendant Christopher White is dismis sed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Sheriff John Layton is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Defendant Warren Hoosier, a Sheriff Deputy, is dismissed for failure to state a cla im upon which relief may be granted. The clerk is designated, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), to issue and serve process on the defendants in the manner specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1). Process shall consist of the amended complaint, applicable forms and this Entry. (SEE ENTRY). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/13/2012. (copies to Long, Quarlos, Moore and Rohana via US Mail) (JKS)
|
|
Filing
4
ENTRY Concerning Selected Matters and Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt 2 , is GRANTED. The assessment of even an initial partial filing fee is not feasible at this time. Claims against the John and Jane Doe defendants (all two hundred of them) must be dismissed. Claims against Mayor Greg Ballard are also dismissed. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claims resolved in this Entry. The clerk is designat ed to issue and serve process on the remaining defendants in the manner specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1). Process shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms and this Entry. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/19/2012. (JKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
