CARTER v. FAMILY VIDEO MOVIE CLUB, INC.

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Indiana Southern District CARTER v. FAMILY VIDEO MOVIE CLUB, INC.

CARTER v. FAMILY VIDEO MOVIE CLUB, INC.

Plaintiff:	MICHAEL CARTER
Defendant:	FAMILY VIDEO MOVIE CLUB, INC.
Case Number:	1:2012cv00108
Filed:	January 24, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge:	Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 2, 2013	Filing 60 ENTRY - Mr. Carter has shown that there are disputes of material fact that would preclude summary judgment on his ADA claim for failure to hire at the Rockville Store. He has demonstrated that he can meet the definition of a "qualified individ ual" under the ADA, and Mr. Carter has presented evidence that Family Video's proffered reason for not hiring him was pretext for discrimination. For the forgoing reasons, Family Video's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 38 ) is GR ANTED with respect to the claim for failure to hire based only upon his expressed interest in working at the Raceway Store, and DENIED with respect to the claim at the Rockville Store. The parties are directed to contact the Magistrate Judge to discuss rescheduling of the settlement conference, final pretrial conference and trial date. (See Dkt. 59 ). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/2/2013. (JD)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 2, 2013

Filing 60 ENTRY - Mr. Carter has shown that there are disputes of material fact that would preclude summary judgment on his ADA claim for failure to hire at the Rockville Store. He has demonstrated that he can meet the definition of a "qualified individ ual" under the ADA, and Mr. Carter has presented evidence that Family Video's proffered reason for not hiring him was pretext for discrimination. For the forgoing reasons, Family Video's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 38 ) is GR ANTED with respect to the claim for failure to hire based only upon his expressed interest in working at the Raceway Store, and DENIED with respect to the claim at the Rockville Store. The parties are directed to contact the Magistrate Judge to discuss rescheduling of the settlement conference, final pretrial conference and trial date. (See Dkt. 59 ). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/2/2013. (JD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CARTER v. FAMILY VIDEO MOVIE CLUB, INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL CARTER
Represented By:	Barry A. Macey
Represented By:	Quincy Erica Sauer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: FAMILY VIDEO MOVIE CLUB, INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?