SMITH v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORIZON et al
Plaintiff: ERIC SMITH
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORIZON and DOE DEFENDANTS
Case Number: 1:2012cv00159
Filed: February 6, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 167 ENTRY denying 164 Plaintiff's Motion to Correct Error because Mr. Smith has failed to show any error. **SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION**. Copy Mailed. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/22/2014. (MGG)
August 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 162 ORDER granting Defendant's 117 Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant's 126 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Plaintiff's 138 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Mr. Smith has not presented evidence sufficient to create a genuine issue of fact with respect to any of his claims. Judgment consistent with this Entry and with the stipulation filed on August 27, 2013, shall now issue. **SEE ORDER** Copy mailed. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/28/2014. (ADH)
October 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 132 ENTRY - The plaintiff's motion for discovery extension and for enlargement of time to respond to the defendants' motions for summary judgment (Dkt. 129 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The plaintiff's request for additiona l time to take expert depositions is DENIED, as further explained in paragraph 2 of this Entry. The plaintiff shall have additional time, through November 12, 2013, in which to respond to both motions for summary judgment. The plaintiff's mot ion for order to leave prison, for appointment of counsel, or to depose witnesses, requests the Court to order one of three alternative options to assist him in obtaining expert testimony to use in opposition of the defendants' motions for summary judgment (Dkt. 130 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/11/2013. Copy mailed. (JD)
August 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 113 ENTRY denying 112 Motion for Reconsideration re 109 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/19/2013. Copy Mailed. (JD)
September 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ENTRY - The amended complaint has been screened and shall proceed as submitted. The clerk is designated to issue and serve process on the defendants Bruce Lemmon, A. Baker, Kim Don and Michael Mitcheff. Defendant Corizon has appeared by counsel and shall have through October 4, 2012, in which to answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/5/2012. Copies Mailed.(JD)
August 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ENTRY Discussing Selected Matters - Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (dkt. no. 53 ), Motion to Appoint Counsel (dkt. no. 54 ) and Motion to Appoint Counsel for Purposes of Obtaining Discovery for Preparation of Summary Judgment (dkt. no. 55 ) are DENIED. *SEE ENTRY*. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/22/2012. Copy Mailed. (JD)
March 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Entry Discussing Motion to Remand - Plaintiff's 10 Objection to the Removal and Motion to Remand is DENIED. The clerk shall change the Nature of Suit code from 440 to 555. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/5/2012. (JD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SMITH v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORIZON et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Adam Clay
Represented By: Elizabeth R Polleys
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CORIZON
Represented By: Carol A. Dillon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOE DEFENDANTS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ERIC SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?