UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE v. SPERRY

Plaintiff: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Defendant: PHILLIP F. SPERRY
Case Number: 1:2012cv00320
Filed: March 12, 2012
Court: Indiana Southern District Court
Office: Indianapolis Office
Referring Judge: Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Taxes
Cause of Action: 31:3731 Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 24, 2013 40 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - The Court GRANTS the Government's Motion for Summary Judgment, [dkt. 17 ], and DENIES Mr. Sperry's Motion for Summary Judgment, [dkt. 20 ]. Judgment will enter accordingly. ***SEE ORDER***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/24/2013. (JKS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE v. SPERRY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Represented By: Laura C. Beckerman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PHILLIP F. SPERRY
Represented By: Craig Rogers Benson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?