HOUSTON v. HYATT REGENCY INDIANAPOLIS et al
||HYATT REGENCY INDIANAPOLIS and HYATT CORPORATION
||March 14, 2012
||US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
||William T. Lawrence
||Debra McVicker Lynch
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 16, 2014
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 206 Motion for Sanctions filed by ANGEL HOUSTON. Ms. Houston's counsel is thus ORDERED to file a petition for fees with corresponding support within fourteen days of this Entry. This resolves all pending motions in this cause. The Court will enter final judgment after the amount of sanctions is determined (see R&R for additional information). Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/16/2014.(SWM)
|February 3, 2014
ENTRY granting Defendant's 83 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot Defendant's 143 Motion to Bifurcate. Defendants Hyatt Regency Indianapolis and Hyatt Corporation argue in their brief support ing their motion for summary judgment that the Hyatt Regency Indianapolis is an assumed business name and not a recognized business entity and should be dismissed from the case. The Court agrees- -Defendant Hyatt Regency Indianapolis is DISMISSED from this matter. Therefore, when the Court refers to "the Hyatt," it is only referring to the Hyatt Corporation (SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 2/3/2014. (SWM)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?