PERKINS v. JONES et al
| STACY K. PERKINS |
| AMY JONES and INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT |
| 1:2012cv00490 |
| April 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ENTRY - These circumstances show that the motion for disqualification was not timely filed and in being filed after the entry of final judgment was likely not even filed for a legitimate purpose. The plaintiff's motion for disqualification [Dkt 34 ] is DENIED. ***SEE ENTRY***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/27/2013. (copy to Stacy Perkins via US Mail) (JKS)
|
|
Filing
33
ENTRY Concerning Selected Matters - The motion to reopen and reinstate civil complaint 31 is denied. The motion to dismiss civil complaint against selected defendants 30 is denied. ***SEE ENTRY***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/1/2013. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail) (JKS)
|
|
Filing
8
ENTRY AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION - The amended complaint filed by Stacy Perkins has been considered. Perkins' amended complaint fails to cure the deficiencies noted in the Entry of July 17, 2012. Perkins' amended complaint could be un derstood as asserting claims under Indiana state law. Because all federal claims have been dismissed at this early point, the court declines to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction over any other asserted state law claim including that of libel and false arrest. Any claim based on state law is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (SEE ENTRY). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/12/2012. (Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail)(JKS)
|
|
Filing
6
ENTRY Dismissing Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - For the reasons explained in this Entry, the complaint of Stacy Perkins is dismissed because it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The action is not dismissed at this point. Rather, Perkins will be permitted to file an amended complaint with respect to one of the two defendants. If an amended complaint is filed as permitted in this Entry, the court will determine its legal sufficiency and enter whatever or der which is warranted. If no amended complaint is filed as directed in this Entry, the action will be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/17/2012. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail)(JKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
