CENTER FOR INQUIRY, INC. et al v. CLERK, MARION CIRCUIT COURT et al
| MICHELLE LANDRUM, REBA BOYD WOODEN, JOHN KIEL and CENTER FOR INQUIRY, INC. |
| PROSECUTOR, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA and CLERK, MARION CIRCUIT COURT |
| 1:2012cv00623 |
| May 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
CLOSED JUDGMENT-The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit having, on 7/14/2014, issued its decision in this case and having instructed this Court to issue a permanent injunction in this matter and the parties having submitted their p roposed form of final judgment and the Court having read the filing, and, being duly advised, enters the following findings and Final Judgment in this cause. Pursuant to the agreement of the parties the time for plaintiffs to petition for reasonable attorneys' fees and costs is extended to 30 days after this date (See Final Judgment). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 8/6/2014.(CBU)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER - denying 16 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Final judgment shall now issue in conjunction with this entry *** SEE ORDER ***. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 11/30/2012. (CKM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
