FLYNN CREEK PARTNERS, LLC v. METRO HOLDINGS ONE, LLC et al
| FLYNN CREEK PARTNERS, LLC |
| METRO HOLDINGS ONE, LLC, QUAKER SALES & DISTRIBUTION, INC. and EXPROMAN, INC. |
| 1:2012cv00653 |
| May 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Quaker is ORDERED to show cause as to why this case should not be remanded due its failure to establish complete diversity of citizenship. It may do so by filing a jurisdictional statement by May 25, 2012, specifically setti ng forth jurisdictional allegations to establish the citizenship of the other parties. With regard to the unincorporated entities, Quaker is reminded that citizenship "must be traced through however many layers of partners or members there ma y be," Hart, 336 F.3d at 542, and it is insufficient to allege that all partners are citizens of "X" state or that no partners are citizens of "X" state, Peters v. Astrazeneca LP, 224 Fed. Appx. 503, 505 (7th Cir. 2007). If Plaintiff disagrees with the jurisdictional statement, it should file its objection within 14 days of Quaker's filing. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/16/2012. (JKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
