TWITTY v. BUTTS

TWITTY v. BUTTS

Petitioner:	TERRY R. TWITTY, Sr.
Respondent:	KEITH BUTTS
Case Number:	1:2012cv00985
Filed:	July 18, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge:	Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 13, 2013	Filing 18 ENTRY - The Petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. 1 ) must be DENIED and the action dismissed with prejudice. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. The Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/13/2013. Copy Mailed. (JD)
July 24, 2012	Filing 3 Entry and Order to Show Cause - The petitioner shall have through August 15, 2012, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. The third claim in the petition for writ of hab eas corpus is summarily DISMISSED. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claim(s) resolved in this Entry. The Respondent shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. This shall be done wi thin twenty (20) days after the date this Entry is signed. The petitioner shall have twenty (20) days after service of such answer or return to order to show cause on him in which to reply. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/24/2012. Copy Mailed.(JD)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 13, 2013

Filing 18 ENTRY - The Petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. 1 ) must be DENIED and the action dismissed with prejudice. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. The Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/13/2013. Copy Mailed. (JD)

July 24, 2012

Filing 3 Entry and Order to Show Cause - The petitioner shall have through August 15, 2012, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. The third claim in the petition for writ of hab eas corpus is summarily DISMISSED. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claim(s) resolved in this Entry. The Respondent shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. This shall be done wi thin twenty (20) days after the date this Entry is signed. The petitioner shall have twenty (20) days after service of such answer or return to order to show cause on him in which to reply. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/24/2012. Copy Mailed.(JD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TWITTY v. BUTTS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: TERRY R. TWITTY, Sr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Represented By:	Justin F. Roebel
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?