SLABAUGH et al v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO. et al
Plaintiff: BOBBIE SLABAUGH and MATT SLABAUGH
Defendant: LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC. and STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO.
Case Number: 1:2012cv01020
Filed: July 25, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Young
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 286 ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO BAR PLAINTIFFS' EXPERT WITNESSES - 185 LG's Motion to Bar Plaintiffs' Expert Witnesses is DENIED. Plaintiffs have 21 days from the date of this Entry to supplement the expert disclosures for Dr. Knoll, Dr. Epstein, Dr. Whitaker, and Dr. Buckel, consistent with this Entry. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 3/26/2015. (LBT)
March 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 282 ORDER ADOPTING 193 Report and Recommendations. The court ORDERS LG to produce the documents within 14 days of this order. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 3/13/2015. (TMD)
February 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 267 ORDER granting 217 Motion to Compel; denying 234 Motion for Oral Argument on Motion to Compel. The Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel [Dkt. 217], and the depositions of Defendants LG Electronics USA, Inc. and LG Electronics , Inc., as noticed on September 3, 2014 [Dkt. 218-2, 218-3], are ORDERED to proceed forthwith. Defense counsel shall confer with Plaintiffs' counsel, either by telephone or in person, on or before February 13, 2015 in order to determine depos ition dates amenable to both parties, which depositions shall occur on or before March 13, 2015. Pursuant to Rule 37, Defendants are additionally ORDERED to pay all reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, caused by Defendants' fai lure to appear for their depositions. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(C). Plaintiffs shall file an itemized request for such fees and expenses within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Defendants LG Electronics USA, Inc. and LG Electronics, Inc. may respond within fourteen (14) days thereafter, and Plaintiffs may file a reply within seven (7) days of any response. Additionally, because the Court determined that oral argument was not necessary, Plaintiffs' Request for Oral Argument on Motion to Compel [Dkt. 234] is DENIED. **SEE ORDER**. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 2/3/2015. (MGG)
November 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 248 ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 195 Motion for Attorney Fees and Expenses Associated with Plaintiffs' Opposition to the LG Defendants' Motion to Compel (see Order for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 11/17/2014. (SWM)
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 191 ORDER denying 157 Motion to Compel. Defendant LG Electronics USA is ordered to pay all of plaintiffs' reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, caused by its premature filing of this motion to compel. Plaintiffs shall file an ite mized request for such fees and expenses within 21 days of this Order. Defendant LG Electronics USA, may respond within 7 days thereafter, and Plaintiffs may file a reply within 7 days of any response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 8/5/2014. (CBU)
May 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 175 ORDER granting 100 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting 112 Motion for Leave to File; denying 119 Motion for Sanctions; denying 133 Motion to Strike ; granting 165 Motion for Hearing on LG's Motion to Compel and Other Pending Motions as Deemed Necessary by the Court. **SEE ORDER**. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 5/1/2014. (MGG)
September 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER granting Pltfs' 66 Motion to Compel (see Order). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 9/5/2013. (SWM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SLABAUGH et al v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC.
Represented By: Edward W. Hearn
Represented By: Susan Kathleen Swing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO.
Represented By: Dennis F. Cantrell
Represented By: Anna Muehling Mallon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BOBBIE SLABAUGH
Represented By: Jacob R. Cox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MATT SLABAUGH
Represented By: Jacob R. Cox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?