STEELE v. OFFICE OF THE MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Indiana Southern District STEELE v. OFFICE OF THE MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR

STEELE v. OFFICE OF THE MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR

Plaintiff:	HOWARD STEELE
Defendant:	OFFICE OF THE MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR
Case Number:	1:2012cv01039
Filed:	July 27, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Sarah Evans Barker
Presiding Judge:	Mark J. Dinsmore
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 12, 2015	Filing 114 ENTRY Granting Summary Judgment in Favor of the Defendant and Directing the Entry of Final Judgment. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/12/2015.(CBU)
January 8, 2015	Filing 112 ENTRY and NOTICE - The parties are now notified that pursuant to Rule 56(f) absent any timely objection, summary judgment will be entered in favor of defendant Office of the Marion County Prosecutor on grounds not raised by either party. The partie s shall have through February 2, 2015, in which to file any objection or otherwise respond to this proposed ruling along with any admissible evidence (not already in the record) necessary to support the objection or the Court's proposed determination. Given the age of this case, and the voluminous briefing, no extensions of time should be anticipated. SEE ENTRY Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/8/2015.(AH)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 12, 2015

Filing 114 ENTRY Granting Summary Judgment in Favor of the Defendant and Directing the Entry of Final Judgment. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/12/2015.(CBU)

January 8, 2015

Filing 112 ENTRY and NOTICE - The parties are now notified that pursuant to Rule 56(f) absent any timely objection, summary judgment will be entered in favor of defendant Office of the Marion County Prosecutor on grounds not raised by either party. The partie s shall have through February 2, 2015, in which to file any objection or otherwise respond to this proposed ruling along with any admissible evidence (not already in the record) necessary to support the objection or the Court's proposed determination. Given the age of this case, and the voluminous briefing, no extensions of time should be anticipated. **SEE ENTRY** Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/8/2015.(AH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STEELE v. OFFICE OF THE MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: OFFICE OF THE MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR
Represented By:	Alexander Phillip Will
Represented By:	Morgan Lee Wills
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: HOWARD STEELE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?