REBIRTH CHRISTIAN ACADEMY DAYCARE, INC. v. MINOTT, et al.
| REBIRTH CHRISTIAN ACADEMY DAYCARE, INC. |
| MICHAEL A. GARGANO, THE DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF FAMILY RESOURCES, THE DIVISION OF FAMILY RESOURCES and THE INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2012cv01067 |
| July 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER denying Defendant's 66 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting Plaintiff's partial 68 Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties are ordered to file a joint status report to the court within 60 days of the date of this entry out lining the agreed upon procedures, or, if they are unable to reach an agreement, to file separate status reports outlining their respective positions so that the Court may further address the issue (See Order). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/30/2015. (CBU)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion to File Surreply (Dkt. 36 ) is GRANTED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 26 ) is GRANTED as to the individual capacity defendants and DENIED as to the claims against defendants in their official capacities. The case will proceed accordingly. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/13/2014. (JD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
