JAMERSON v. ASTRUE
| DENISE JAMERSON |
| COMMISSIONER MICHAEL J. ASTRUE |
| SSA (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2012cv01147 |
| August 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Richard L. Young |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ENTRY ADOPTING IN PART 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 23 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by DENISE JAMERSON. The award of attorney's fees should be paid in the amount of $11,324.90. The Commissioner has TWENTY-EIGHT days from the d ate of this Entry to file a statement with the court, along with supporting evidence, that Ms. Jamerson owes an outstanding debt to the Government as of the date of the award and that it will exercise its right of offset. If no statement is filed wit hin that time period, the Government is ordered to honor her assignment of the EAJA award and direct the award of $11,324.90 to her counsel, Nicholas Lavella. The Commissioner has SEVENTY days from the date of this Entry or the date it chooses to not pursue an appeal, whichever is earlier, to submit this claim for payment to the Treasury. She shall cooperate with the Treasury to ensure the quick payment of the award. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 11/21/2013.(NRN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
